threegee

A complete myth, though one that the unions would like you to believe. Market forces are responsible for the advancement of living standards, and the unions have been a huge drag on the working man and our country for the past 50 years or more. Yes, there was a time, but both the Labour Party and the Trade Union movement thrive on the past. The traditional unions have destroyed jobs and discouraged the creation of new ones. You've just got to look around the world to see the decline in traditionally unionised industries and the rise in non-unionised ones. Companies only grow when everyone is singing from the same song-sheet, smart managment knows that and smart labour knows that. Them and us, and everybody loses! Anyway, a great day for the Tory and LD parties; they must have been praying for Labour to "return to it's roots" as the unelectable face of class-war! Even (especially?) his own brother knows that this is all going to end in tears for the party.

Wot no Carla Bruni?! Anyway, I predict legal action from the Pasedena Roof Orchestra.

Ah another David Bailey type! Can't give you any advice on camera backs or fronts or bottoms or tops but you'd near certainly do better to buy it in the US of A, providing it isn't going to need an EU warranty repair AND you can get it past HM Customs without getting stung for VAT and import duty. Me? At about the three megapixel mark I bowed out of the expensive camera thing. It's the shot that matters. Most often life delivers you only one opporunity, and you can easily fluk it trying to get the numbers right. My new phone is better than the best digital cameras of ten years ago, and it's always on and always with me.

And who can remember the 'V' Bombers (Victor, Valiant, Vulcan) at the Acklington air shows around 1960 when they were fully operational? Without today's H&S and security hang-ups you could get almost close enough to touch, even when they were taxiing. Real flying displays by the early jet fighters, and not simply static exhibits. The RAF had a genuine German V1 that you could walk around and inspect close-up, and many other interesting exhibits in the Acklington hangars.

We've now had the frank - but long overdue - admission from the BBC that it was "massively biased" in some of its political coverage. http://www.telegraph...k-Thompson.html But is this simply a step on the path to cosying up the the present government? Secret talks on how to break the bad news about real extent of the cuts to the great British public would seem to indicate this. http://www.telegraph...g-the-cuts.html If the BBC is entirely independent of the government, as we've always been told, why shouldn't we be allowed to examine what is being discussed? It is after all our newly *elected* heads of government who are discussing what the BBC should be allowed to charge US, and what portion of that Mr Thompson can hold on to. But hang on, I've misunderstood; that's not what these secret talks are about at all! They are apparently about how the government cuts can be sold to us in a gentle manner. So should these discussions even be taking place at all? Unless, of course, they are really about the aforementioned "what the BBC should be allowed to charge US, and what portion of that Mr Thompson can hold on to". The overwhelming likelihood is that the two matters are mutually dependant, and we really can't be privileged to know any of the dirty details. So, once again, the ongoing myth of the Beeb's total independence hits the buffers of political reality.

The explanation is both simple and embarrassing: we ran out of HD space late last night! This has accelerated our plans to move BCOUK to another, currently grossly underused, machine with a much bigger Hard Drive. This should improve the response times for locals too. A few weeks maybe; meanwhile we will watch the disk space issue carefully.

Yeah, looks like it. That would be because we used Wordpress for the news content for a while, but we've now moved on to a fully integrated solution. Now you only need one login site-wide - including forthcoming B-Mail. (Umm... is B-Mail common knowledge now y'all? ) Back on thread: well... The Bedlington Academy joins a long list of might-have-beens. Who is to blame on this occasion? Well no one in particular it seems. It's simply a hapless victim of Gordon Brown's phony economic cycle. I'd be more than interested to hear what our new MP has to say about this though.

Beware of buying cheap memory - particularly cheap flash memory - on e-Bay. A 32GB memory stick for £20 seems like a bargain. To some it is, because all they do is plug it into their machine and move a Gig or two of files onto it. Weeks or months later it goes faulty - or that's how it seems. The fact is it was never a 32GB (or 64Gb or 128GB) device in the first place. It probably won't even give you the full capacity of the 4GB chip inside either; because that's a factory reject with too many bad cells to make 4GB USB sticks with. These chips should go in the bin; and they probably have, before being fished out by low-paid workers and sold-on to back street factories to make "high-capacity" memory sticks with. Your computer believes what the device says about its storage capacity, and you believe what your computer tells you. That's how they get away with it for just long enough to disappear with your money. Don't pay any attention to the positive feedback either. That conman or woman working from a Far East flat has built it up by shill bidding on their own stuff. And they are happily building up fake feedback on other accounts to switch to when the heat is turned up on the current ones. Some of the early buyers they have duped will help them along with this too. Save the link and revisit later to see what real customers think. http://feedback.e-bay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=aaaservice_2010&ftab=AllFeedback (Note: remove dash in e-bay to get link to work)

Yeah, that extra 6mm in depth (in a slightly smaller device) has to be a deal breaker if you don't want a real computer with real keyboard, all the extra features, and a proper phone with 80 minutes extra talk time.. Then again if you don't you'd be far better off with a cool N8 than a clunky iWorshipSteveJobsPhone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N8

Seems like a nice guy! I'd much rather be shot by him than by a half-crazed Nothumbria Police gunman. They don't plant grass for children or fly prettier flags. And his policy on traffic violations is much more user-friendly too - y'all!

Thought I'd share this one with you, though it's sooo obvious once you do it! Edit Menu --> Preferences --> Select the Advanced Icon (the Gear wheel) --> Select the Network Tab --> Hit the "Clear Now" button. This clears the browser cache, and this will probably do the trick on other browsers too.

Ah, the vapourware peddlers are at it already: http://www.play.com/...p/Product.html# Think I saw a £999.99 price in there somewhere. Which is probably what you are going to have to pay to get one this side of Christmas. But if this if the model without HSDPA then having to use a USB dongle is a big let-down, and it would certainly be better to wait. Me, I will pick one up for South of £500 sometime - unless something better presents itself in the interim. BTW I got that Nokia N900 sooner than I though, but fourgee (anyone want to but an iPhone? ) is "testing" it for me just at the moment. Review coming.

That is just for the CPU. But thanks for confirming that it's about ten times the price of the iPad's ARM chip. Not sure about the screen cost, but I'd think that for those advanced displays you'd probably be about right. Then there's the rest of the chip-set, the memory devices and DIMMs, the support chips, the graphics, the 64GB SSD, batteries, two expensive multi-layer PCBs, several hundred SM components, and cabling. Then there's the WiFi and Bluetooth modules, and the 3G module. On top of that there's the licence fees to M$ and to the BIOS manufacturer. In the quantities they are envisaging the casings alone will probably cost more than the total ex-factory cost of an iPad. That's before you even get to setting up the placing machines for assembly, hand assembly and testing, distribution and retail packaging and promotion costs, import duty, dealers margin then VAT on top of everything! After that the support costs and guarantee wastage. If you are only making say 5000 then there's little chance of getting any real economies of scale, and you are looking at about £800-1000 in the shops before you make a bean. And that's assuming you sell the lot at full price - which seldom happens these days, hence the huge number of price cuts.

Only one screen for a short while - that's a disaster! Of course there are some devices that have only one screen all the time, and some of those have touch screens that occupy almost all the viewing space some of the time. Haven't heard any complaints about this though. There are even devices that waste huge areas of interface space up front with a clunky mechanical keyboard that just says QWERTY most of the time, and that you have to make, and distribute, in 38 different versions to keep everyone happy. The Intel CPU alone will cost Toshiba three figures in 1000 off quantities. - this isn't a weedy $10 ARM chip. Their bulk buy-in parts cost must be way over £500 a unit on this baby. Something like four times the production cost of an iPad I'd guess. Price up that SSD before you make silly statements like that. Probably why it's just a limited edition: they don't anticipate making any money out of it - even at a grand retail!

I can now be revealed that: ????? = Mark Papermaster http://www.loopinsig...e-antenna-woes/ What a wonderful company to work for; Jobs takes all the glory, and some other poor bee takes all the blame!

LOL - you obviously didn't look at the videos. It's not just a soft keyboard - desireable though that is for the spilt coffee, and customisation angles - it has both tactile feedback and it doubles as a proper screen extension. People who've tried it says it's in a completely different class to the iPad and a pleasure to type on. And, of course, the "main" screen is touch too. Lot's more CPU power than the tablets that are coming, and a four hour battery life is easily good enough for me providing the device is pocketable. Anything under £800 and it's a steal, esp if it has HSDPA built-in. Ten times more of a computer than the iPad! Though only a limited edition, it shows what is on the way with the 32nm Intel CPUs that are just around the corner.

Only 700 grams in weight, and with 'N' WiFi and Bluetooth 2.1. Supposed to have built-in 3G radio too (presumably HSDPA/HSUPA) so that would be just brilliant. It would be a shame to have to use something this cool with a USB dongle when you are out and about! The real problem here seems to be that with a limited edition there's going to be no second sourcing of the custom batteries. You will never see anything like this from Apple, because there's just too many expensive bits in it, and at their mark-ups the price would be so astronomic they couldn't even sell them to their biggest Fanboys!

Same thing happening with TV; HD is going to be almost all subscription if not PPV. The new ITV HD channels are going to be exclusively on Sky satellite, where they can tap into the revenue stream. There's a degree of this going on already on the net: high bandwidth sites have to pay for faster content delivery over dedicated links. If they didn't they'd rapidly become unusable. The problem chiefly occurs at the consumer end where ISPs are effectively subsidising the process. The iPlayer trick is to offload the distribution onto other people using Bit Torrent technology. That begs the question of whether some of the licence fee should be redistributed to UK ISPs, as the Beeb is sidestepping its traditional role of transmitting its own material.

Fires in Russia destroying crops and whole communities. They are pondering stopping grain exports as they need it themselves. Bread prices will inevitably rise. Hoard flour you cooks! What's even worse is the current Marmite shortage in the Med; send supplies - urgent!

I'm gonna say that it has a certain inevitability to it. And, of course, I'm going to say that - as Apple is the antithesis of open source - it was only a matter of time. The really sad thing is that the people who were conned by the Job's Marketing Machine won't even understand the implications. They will continue to buy overpriced CrApple at every new flawed product release. However, the majority will still buy into the proposition that you can have closed source without any one person's "grand vision" of how it should all be. A trade-off between a bit more hassle and a fair bit more flexibility, all at a significantly lower perceived price. That's still the overall winner as far a Joe P. is concerned. That there should be a third way that's both better and toll-free, is beyond the bounds of credibility. Yes, "Free" is a really tough sell when it involves turning your brain on! And here I include many supposedly computer literate people.

"once-in-a-generation" space storm http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7923069/Nasa-scientists-braced-for-solar-tsunami-to-hit-earth.html One of these days the "man-made global warming" lobby will make the perfectly obvious connection between solar activity and Earth temperatures. But, for now at least, why let the obvious stand in the way of making a political statement?

http://www.telegraph...0-on-iPads.html You really couldn't make this up if you tried! 54 or so technologically-challenged "public servants" seem to think that the most transitory closed-architecture gadget from Apple is somehow going to transform their productivity. Amongst the reasons proffered: Actually, councillor, the best way to save the Council money would be to replace you with someone who knows how to use the technology you've already been provided with at considerable public expense! And, no; that wasn't a Labourite Thickie. It was a New-gen Cameronian Tory councillor. Though the Labourite Thickies are in on the very same plot!

Ouch! No more dirt cheap RAM! Went to buy 2GB SODIMMs which cost £15 to £17 at the beginning of the year, and the same parts are now over £37 at the cheapest supplier, and generally well over £40. Flash of all kinds is up sharply too. Maybe the first time for decades that hasn't regularly fallen year on year. Still cheap compared with other things, I suppose, but no more free lunch. Thought: If computers are still falling in price (and they still seem to be), and the chips are going up rapidly, then that's an "interesting" situation.

I think maybe you are wrong here. Way back I seem to remember using Windoze loader to kick into Fedora. I can't see any reason why it wouldn't, seeing that you are simply transferring control in just the same way as it does to its own active partition. They'd have to be working hard at it to *stop* you doing this. Anyway, it turns out it wasn't even necessary to manually edit the Grub configuration file, as I found a GUI to do this in YaST. Used it to make Suse the default o/s, and move Windoze XP down the list. And... it didn't complain about my manual daubings in the file either! Now to use the Suse live-boot USB stick I just created to rescue a poor deluded Windows user who's registry has just gone TU! Let's see if Suse can restore it from a backup (yes - amazingly, there is a fairly recent backup!) without having to seek out a Windoze rescue disk. Or - like yer average Windows user - reformat and re-install with total data loss!