March 26, 200917 yr New Look Bedlington.co.ukshouldn't bedlington have a capital B? mmm looks templatey!
March 26, 200917 yr shouldn't bedlington have a capital B?It's 2.0 don't you know?Point taken though should probably change it.
March 26, 200917 yr shouldn't bedlington have a capital B? mmm looks templatey!does it need a capital, if it's a website without a capital? ooh, I don't know the protocol on this branch of lingistics... :owhat would Noam Chomsky do? I like the picture too!Keep up the good work GGGG! (and good diversion tactics too!)
March 26, 200917 yr (and good diversion tactics too!)Yeah the Bedderberg Group just got a little larger.
March 28, 200917 yr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsumComing from a background in the print and publishing industry, and being a writer myself, I was aware of Lorem Ipsum; I just thought it was funny. I'll get me coat....
March 28, 200917 yr Mrsvic is breaking the forum rules by posting a smiley without any explanation!...You want an explanation?! Let me dispel the "ugly rumour" that I know what the ^$%^%$ is going on here.Anyway, you know what happened when Manchester overreached themselves and made the B too big. It all ended in tears and recriminations (coincidentally about lack of support). I say let bedlington's own Thomas Heatherwick do his own thing. It won't cost a couple of Mill either!
March 28, 200917 yr Author You want an explanation?! Let me dispel the "ugly rumour" that I know what the ^$%^%$ is going on here.Anyway, you know what happened when Manchester overreached themselves and made the B too big. It all ended in tears and recriminations (coincidentally about lack of support). I say let bedlington's own Thomas Heatherwick do his own thing. It won't cost a couple of Mill either!what are you talking about? manchesters b was an art installation not a capital letter on a web site! big difference anyway it should be a capital so people dont think bedlington is full if thick scruffs with bad grammar!
March 29, 200917 yr I say that those who are able to maintain good standards in grammar, syntax, punctuation and half-a-hundred other rules should continue to do so; we of the GCE 'O'level English generation have a duty of care to the Forum. A word of warning ... do we really want to leave this place in the hands of the entry-level communicators or their spawn, those only capable of using texting structure?
April 9, 200917 yr Are we in the future now?Very bauhaus, the new, clean lines and the restrained greys and blacks.I likes it.
April 9, 200917 yr Are we in the future now?Very bauhaus, the new, clean lines and the restrained greys and blacks.I likes it.Consider it a work in progress.
April 9, 200917 yr Consider it a work in progress. Yeah it's not quite finished because the content writers were being impatient Keep in mind as well that this is purely an image revamp on the forums front, functionally it should be identical... for now.
April 9, 200917 yr And while we're on the subject of content anybody is welcome to submit articles for publication.
April 9, 200917 yr Author bah! why's it grey is that to reflect the town? cleaner design maybe, dull colours yes! i prefered the white and blue
April 9, 200917 yr bah! why's it grey is that to reflect the town? cleaner design maybe, dull colours yes! i prefered the white and blue Plenty of opportunities to try your own ideas out coming soon monsta. I look forward to seeing the results!
April 9, 200917 yr I like the look of the site now, not quite sure of the grey but i could get used to it.
April 9, 200917 yr OK reverted to a white background, thoughts?Really don't like it when it's all white.
April 9, 200917 yr Really don't like it when it's all white.Yeah wasn't supposed to happen that the pitfalls of editing a live site.
April 9, 200917 yr The site looks fine the way it is now. Is it a lighter grey? or have my eyes just got used to it?
Create a free account or sign in to comment