Brian Cross Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 What about the great win by England over their traditional rivals Australia. it was a great test series and the man of the series has to be Freddie Flintoff does any one agree ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsta® Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I hate cricket thank the lord the BBC dropped it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Pimp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 What about the great win by England over their traditional rivals Australia. it was a great test series and the man of the series has to be Freddie Flintoff does any one agree ? If you're talking about the 2005 series then I agree with you.However, the 2009 series was a far weaker affair. Both teams were pretty poor. While Flintoff battled bravely against his debilitating knee injury, he was a shadow of the player that dominated in 2005.Strauss was the player of the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Cross Posted August 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 If you're talking about the 2005 series then I agree with you.However, the 2009 series was a far weaker affair. Both teams were pretty poor. While Flintoff battled bravely against his debilitating knee injury, he was a shadow of the player that dominated in 2005.Strauss was the player of the series.I disagree with you H P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Pimp Posted August 27, 2009 Report Share Posted August 27, 2009 About the quality of the cricket or about Flintoff's contribution?Swann had better bowling and batting figures than Flintoff. Strauss was the top run scorer and an inspirational leader. Flintoff's contribution, other than his excellent five-for in the second innings at Lord's, was largely ephemeral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsta® Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 About the quality of the cricket or about Flintoff's contribution?Swann had better bowling and batting figures than Flintoff. Strauss was the top run scorer and an inspirational leader. Flintoff's contribution, other than his excellent five-for in the second innings at Lord's, was largely ephemeral.cricket is as fun as lawn bowls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamburger Pimp Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Attention! Attention! Look at me, everyone!Thanks for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsta® Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 Yeah Thats so Funny a cannit stop laughing! gan and put your head under the front wheel of the x31! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Cross Posted August 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 About the quality of the cricket or about Flintoff's contribution?Swann had better bowling and batting figures than Flintoff. Strauss was the top run scorer and an inspirational leader. Flintoff's contribution, other than his excellent five-for in the second innings at Lord's, was largely ephemeral.About Flintoff's contribution,considering his apparent injuries and his presence on the field seemed to install fire in the England side, the Australian commentator's and me seem to agree on this point dunno could be wrong........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create a free account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now