They Don't Like It Up 'em!

[threegee]

Amusing to see the discomfort of their lordships (aka Tony's Cronies in the High Court) over the massive press reaction to their judgement on the Article 50 shenanigans.

So shaken are the lawyers that they've been leaning on Lord Chancellor, Liz Truss (one of Dodgy Dave's cronies - great how you can get to be THE senior law officer these days with no formal legal experience; alternating around the LibLabCon stitch-up as convenient; and sleeping with a married Tory MP) to condemn:-

Quote

"serious and unjustified attacks on the judiciary".

"The Bar Council of England and Wales condemns the serious and unjustified attacks on the judiciary arising out of the Article 50 litigation,” the statement said.

"It regrets the lack of public statement by the Lord Chancellor condemning these attacks and calls upon the Lord Chancellor to do so as a matter of urgency.

“A strong independent judiciary is essential to a functioning democracy and to upholding the rule of law."

I'm sure the press would support the last sentence there, except their precise point is that the judiciary isn't seen to be acting independently [of the EU] in this case.  In fact the judiciary should be so independent that it keeps its nose entirely out of politics.  Their narrative is that this is entirely a matter of correct procedure, and that their deliberations are entirely apolitical.   That might have been believable if at least two of their "ludships" had recused themselves as parties with their own fingers in the EU honeypot.

What's more, the public is entitled to take a broader view and ask what consideration was given to matters of correct constitutional procedure during the entry process to the then EEC, and at every salami-slicing attack on British sovereignty and democracy since that time.  The plain answer to that is sweet FA!  Like everything to do with the EU, British constitutional matters have become a one-way street that has no turning, and the cabal that determined that traffic plan is intermingled with the cabal that derives all indirect benefit from traffic flow.

Of course the Machiavellian figure of Tony Blair hangs behind the whole affair.  Blair not only packed the system out with his mates but made new law on an unprecedented scale.  Ironic then that brining to justice the biggest criminal this country has ever known is now "a legal impossibility".  How did that happen then?  To crown it all, rather than stay the low profile team manager of the EUphiles, Blair is now dancing around on the pitch making no secret of his intention to subvert democratic process by all means at his disposal.  These are HIS cronies and placemen - go figure!

So... our judiciary demands respect, and if we don't give it to them the price is sure societal breakdown.  Well, a lot of us feel that we are heading for societal breakdown quite rapidly, and through their agency!

There, and I haven't mentioned Bilderberg once!  Do your own research and weep for our country!

[moe19]

Nigel Farage to Gina Miller 'What part of leave don't you understand?'

.

 

[threegee]

Some supplementary questions:

• Which international bank is picking up the huge legal bills that both you and the "foreign hairdresser" are running up (rather a lot of perms!)?
• How close is the Miller business relationship to Goldman Sachs?
• Have the Millers or their associates had any contact with Tony Blair is recent times?
• Which of your two faces did you use in your modelling career?

If those questions are too difficult then how about:

• When was the last time you ventured outside the M25?