Jump to content

Contributor Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 14/06/16 in all areas

  1. The basic unfairness shown in that video, if true, would get me out on the streets!
    2 points
  2. Wayne David has confirmed the leave campaigners were moved on. Why they were allowed to campaign on that spot for weeks before and nothing done. and why was another of the campaigners stands in the town also closed down Wayne David said, "Sam Gould knows that when the Police asked the Leave supporters to move their stall (for, I am told, safety reasons as it was close to a zebra crossing), I was not in the vicinity. http://www.waynedavid.co.uk/wayne_david_criticises_leave_campaign_for_intimidation_and_lies_in_caerphilly
    1 point
  3. Opening shot: 3 police though one might have been council official. (no turbans or policewomen) 1:26: Two or three police. 1:31: One police (one with turban) plus a rather threatening policeman or council official. 1:35: Policeman with turban again, plus policewoman. 1:38 ditto. 1:40 ditto. 2:02 Three police officials obviously pressuring "GO" stall which clearly isn't causing any traffic or pedestrian obstruction. 2:22 Two police again, with Remain stall not being harassed. It would appear that the prime motivator here was a councillor and his officials, and that the police were only doing what they were asked to do by the council. I know from practical experience how amazingly camera shy our police can be, and these don't appear to be exceptional in that respect. If I said something like "there is something about that video which doesn't quite ring true" you'd have derided my lack of hard evidence. Yet, here you display a baffling degree of criticality for someone who otherwise offers excuses for (and clearly sides with those who wish to turn a blind eye to) mass sex crimes! "I have no interest one way or the other." Oh, I think you surely do!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...