11011100

eW91IGFuZCBtZSBib3RoIQ== ;-)

bW9yZSBpbnRlcmVzdGVkIGluIHRoaXMgTWFsY29sbSBodHRwOi8vZW4ud2lraXBlZGlhLm9yZy93aWtpL0tyeXB0b3M=

Thanks Canny lass - there's a mental image I now need to get rid of... ewww

D'oh! why didn't we think of that sooner...

U29ycnkgSSdtIGEgYmluYXJ5IGd1eSBsaXZpbmcgaW4gYSBoZXggYmFzZWQgd29ybGQsIG5vdyBzdXBlcmNlZWRlZCBieSBhIDY0IGJpdCB3b3JsZC4uLg0KDQpvaCB3ZWxsLi4u

If there wasn't a shortage of fish, I'd say get a boat load!

Nice one! hahaha

01110100 01101001 01111010 01111010 01110111 01100001 01111010 01111010 00100000 00101101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100111 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01100100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01101000 01100101 01100001 01110010 01100100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110111 01101000 01101001 01101100 01100101 00100001

Presumably this is the original Queens Head? Can anyone confirm this?

Vic - I think you're right, we should be careful before using new technologies, NASA has found raised land surface temperatures especially at night, in a HUGE wind farm in Texas. Absorbing wave energy has no effect near to the shore, as the energy will dissipate naturally on the shore anyway. We should monitor the effects, but the effects of global warming will probably overshadow them all. You are correct - Energy cannot naturally be created or destroyed - however it can be transferred to another form, which is the general basis for all energy production. Also making solar panels is a dirty process. We need to invest in these processes to make them cleaner and greener. and yes other processes use things like fibre glass, Kevlar, silicon etc, much of which is mined - but who said mining was wrong???

Coal is a fossil fuel and finite. even the chinese realise this and there are 14 nuclear plants on the mainland and about 27 are in construction. so yes let's follow the chinese! ;-)

sorry I should have qualified that statement - At current production levels well over 200 years for the whole planet. That is of course for Uranium. The extraction of uranium from seawater would generate a 60,000-year supply at present rates, and using fuel-recycling fast-breeder reactors, which generate more fuel than they consume. Breeder reactors could match today's nuclear output for 30,000 years. Did that answer your question Adam?

01001110 01100101 01101001 01101100 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01100101 01100100 00111111 00100000 00111010 01110000

Keith - I agree, there should be more funding for computer training, and not just for the older members of the community. Some kids are being left behind too, and they will need more computer skills in the workplace than ever before. I may be wrong but are they not still being ran on an evening class basis at the local collage and high schools?

01010100 01101000 01100001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01001101 01100001 01101100 01100011 01101111 01101100 01101101 00101110 00100000 00100000 00100000 00001101 00001010