Monsta® Posted May 20, 2010 Report Posted May 20, 2010 its a bit like the grand national only theres no horses or large fences for them to fall over! shame it would be nice to see ed balls get put down!
threegee Posted May 20, 2010 Report Posted May 20, 2010 How can we have a poll when we don't know who the runners are? Nominations now extended to 9th June.Anyway they are ooot for the next five years, at least. So does it matter anyway?You don't know who Diane Abbott is!? http://www.dianeabbott.org.uk/ You can't have been watching much political TV as she frequently appears, and seems to get on quite well with arch Tory, Michael Portillo.Diane seems less wooden and more up-front than most Labour wimmin. Definitely someone I'd buy a used car from (but not a used political party).
Monsta® Posted May 20, 2010 Author Report Posted May 20, 2010 How can we have a poll when we don't know who the runners are? Nominations now extended to 9th June.yes we do i named them! the realistic ones Anyway they are ooot for the next five years, at least. So does it matter anyway?yes because i can see the power sharing ending sooner than later! You don't know who Diane Abbott is!? http://www.dianeabbott.org.uk/ You can't have been watching much political TV as she frequently appears, and seems to get on quite well with arch Tory, Michael Portillo.who cares she's got no chance! and portilos a fat nosed puff Diane seems less wooden and more up-front than most Labour wimmin. Definitely someone I'd buy a used car from (but not a used political party). it must be the barrack effect!
Merlin Posted May 20, 2010 Report Posted May 20, 2010 Monsta you missed out Steve Miller Band, Glen Miller Band and Larry Miller band, or our most famous personality Tommy Miller no relation to the bands :lol: :lol: 1
threegee Posted June 22, 2010 Report Posted June 22, 2010 Well it's sure not going to be Harriet Harman! What a totally hopeless response to the budget speech - so predictable and formulaic it could have been written months ago. Not one iota of original thought, nor any attempt to seize the moment.What's her "real world" job again? Oh yes, a solicitor!
threegee Posted July 25, 2010 Report Posted July 25, 2010 Ed to quit?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/7908683/Ed-Balls-considers-quitting-Labour-leadership-race-after-union-snub.htmlBut, does he have enough of them to go through with it? So... it's either Milliband or Milliband then. My money is on Milliband!
Malcolm Robinson Posted July 25, 2010 Report Posted July 25, 2010 Looks to be far more interesting 'going's on' behind the scenes! Harriet might not be on the ballots but she is making herself a force to be reckoned with and trying to shape the party to her own style.
Malcolm Robinson Posted September 26, 2010 Report Posted September 26, 2010 So no one had Ed to win..........
Pete Posted September 26, 2010 Report Posted September 26, 2010 Well it's sure not going to be Harriet Harman! What a totally hopeless response to the budget speech - so predictable and formulaic it could have been written months ago. Not one iota of original thought, nor any attempt to seize the moment.What's her "real world" job again? Oh yes, a solicitor! True but what were the thought of the labour party when they made her deputy leader? I do not understand the logic behind that decision.
Pete Posted September 26, 2010 Report Posted September 26, 2010 (edited) its a bit like the grand national only theres no horses or large fences for them to fall over! shame it would be nice to see ed balls get put down! You missed one off that poll Monsta, None of the Above Edited September 26, 2010 by Pete
Malcolm Robinson Posted September 27, 2010 Report Posted September 27, 2010 Just for you Pete.........
Pete Posted September 27, 2010 Report Posted September 27, 2010 (edited) Just for you Pete.........Ah well Malcolm were would we be without the unions? Edited September 27, 2010 by Pete
Vic Patterson Posted September 28, 2010 Report Posted September 28, 2010 Working in unsafe conditions, 12 hours a day, earning 5 pound a week! and living in a company house (as long as to toe the line!) shopping at the company store!
Malcolm Robinson Posted September 28, 2010 Report Posted September 28, 2010 That sounds like Tescos Vic!
Pete Posted September 28, 2010 Report Posted September 28, 2010 Where we are now Pete!You have just hit the nail on the head Merlin.
Pete Posted September 28, 2010 Report Posted September 28, 2010 Working in unsafe conditions, 12 hours a day, earning 5 pound a week! and living in a company house (as long as to toe the line!) shopping at the company store! Sounds like the good old days that does Vic.
Merlin Posted September 29, 2010 Report Posted September 29, 2010 Heard that there are plans afoot to do away with the dole office, and they are going to rebuild the workhouse
threegee Posted September 29, 2010 Report Posted September 29, 2010 Working in unsafe conditions, 12 hours a day, earning 5 pound a week! and living in a company house (as long as to toe the line!) shopping at the company store! A complete myth, though one that the unions would like you to believe. Market forces are responsible for the advancement of living standards, and the unions have been a huge drag on the working man and our country for the past 50 years or more. Yes, there was a time, but both the Labour Party and the Trade Union movement thrive on the past.The traditional unions have destroyed jobs and discouraged the creation of new ones. You've just got to look around the world to see the decline in traditionally unionised industries and the rise in non-unionised ones. Companies only grow when everyone is singing from the same song-sheet, smart managment knows that and smart labour knows that. Them and us, and everybody loses!Anyway, a great day for the Tory and LD parties; they must have been praying for Labour to "return to it's roots" as the unelectable face of class-war! Even (especially?) his own brother knows that this is all going to end in tears for the party.
Vic Patterson Posted September 29, 2010 Report Posted September 29, 2010 3G, I must disagree! a myth according to who! (or is that whom!) I believe unions made the changes! but when they began dictating government policy (60's-70's) they stopped being unions and became political parties! overstepping their mandate. (Communist Party, ETU, I was apprentice electrician then)If it wasn't for the unions I don't believe the rich would have given any concessions to the workers. Today it is a different story, the owners are are smarter (and richer) by using the policy as you state, but only because of the stand the unions took many, many years ago. But I guess this could be debated for ever! (Union member for over 40 years, until I was given the boot! )
Merlin Posted September 29, 2010 Report Posted September 29, 2010 Vic it's useless arguing the point with an out and out Tory. Business men and the like have never liked unions and never will, it takes the power to walk rough shod over their labour away!
threegee Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 Vic it's useless arguing the point with an out and out Tory. Business men and the like have never liked unions and never will, it takes the power to walk rough shod over their labour away!a ) I'm not a Tory - out and out or any other kind! Though - like all current political parties - I believe in free markets.b ) This sounds straight out of Marx! That's not how modern industry works.Not all union activity is bad, but in recent decades much of it has been completely counterproductive. That's been particularly the case when it has been used to further someone's political ends in the guise of improving working conditions.
Malcolm Robinson Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 New kind of business model for 2010...........looks the same as old ones but its different!!!
Vic Patterson Posted September 30, 2010 Report Posted September 30, 2010 See, Unions do work, 11 people employed! if it wasn't for the unions the guy in the hole would be holding onto his own rope! on the down side I don't see any lunch boxes!!
Recommended Posts
Create a free account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now