Adam Hogg Posted November 14, 2013 Report Posted November 14, 2013 P.S. Bedlington Town Council, if you are responsible for the Christmas Lights, and Tree... I honestly can't wait to see the place lit up *Round of Applause* , it is going to look beautiful, it is lovely to see Bedlington collecting together as one big community and putting equality and diversity differences aside, and Christmas is no better time to do it!Yes we are in charge of the Christmas lights and tree, but I heard tonight Leading link have been told to close the road because there is going to be a large crowd at the event.
Neil Posted November 15, 2013 Report Posted November 15, 2013 What date is the switch on, haven't seen any advertising for it so not sure where the large crows is coming from other than the school kids?
Adam Hogg Posted November 15, 2013 Report Posted November 15, 2013 The date of the switch on is the 5th December.
Malcolm Robinson Posted November 27, 2013 Report Posted November 27, 2013 I believe this planning application has been withdrawn by the applicants! That's not to say the development is dead only this application has been terminated.
Chris88 Posted November 28, 2013 Report Posted November 28, 2013 Whilst, it would be good news for this application to have been withdrawn, I do not hold my breath. With travesties such as the Old School and the now since long gone barn on the Hartford Road, it seems that heritage loss is an ongoing thing in Bedlington. I have often thought that the Old School would have made a perfect site for a Bedlington museum or information centre. In case anyone hasn't seen, then the page on the Nicholas Nairn Architects page for what they intend to do on the Old School site is interesting, if not an eyesore. The magnificent clock tower of the church will be completely blocked out from the Front Street. What they are proposing doesn't even have chimneys! How can it fit in?! If you go through places like Morpeth and Rothbury, most new developments that are in Conservation areas have chimneys as they fit in amongst the old buildings but that never seems to happen in Bedlington. Good luck with the plans for the Smithy/Stable though. It seems like an interesting little building that in a more valued town you can imagine being converted into an old curiosity/brick-a-brack/ book shop.
John Fox (foxy) Posted November 28, 2013 Report Posted November 28, 2013 In case anyone hasn't seen, then the page on the Nicholas Nairn Architects page for what they intend to do on the Old School site is interesting, if not an eyesore. The magnificent clock tower of the church will be completely blocked out from the Front Street. What they are proposing doesn't even have chimneys! How can it fit in?! If you go through places like Morpeth and Rothbury, most new developments that are in Conservation areas have chimneys as they fit in amongst the old buildings but that never seems to happen in Bedlington. And of course we also have the Wind Turbine to look forward to.
Adam Hogg Posted November 28, 2013 Report Posted November 28, 2013 And of course we also have the Wind Turbine to look forward to.Maybe, Maybe not foxy.65 letters of objection, 2 letters of Neutral (not support or objecting) and 4 letters of support.Can't see how the county can give permission with the public being against the development with a ratio of about 10/1 against it, same with the planning inspectorate with the public and the local town council against the development I can't see how they as well can give permission.I still can't understand how Anthony Rutherford could not use Solar Power he would not have need planning permission for that as far as i know and if he did it would have been passed because nobody would have seen them and objected to them.But keep an eye on it:http://publicaccess.northumberland.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&keyVal=MP3L8GQS2L000
John Fox (foxy) Posted November 28, 2013 Report Posted November 28, 2013 (edited) Maybe, Maybe not foxy. Can't see how the county can give permission with the public being against the development with a ratio of about 10/1 against it, http://publicaccess.northumberland.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&keyVal=MP3L8GQS2L000 Ha Ha Ha! We are talking Coonty Cooncil. Edited November 28, 2013 by foxy
mercuryg Posted November 29, 2013 Report Posted November 29, 2013 "I still can't understand how Anthony Rutherford could not use Solar Power" It's not the power he's interested in, it's the money.
John Fox (foxy) Posted November 29, 2013 Report Posted November 29, 2013 (edited) , Maybe not foxy. 65 letters of objection, 2 letters of Neutral (not support or objecting) and 4 letters of support. Can't see how the county can give permission with the public being against the development with a ratio of about 10/1 against it, same with the planning inspectorate with the public and the local town council against the development I can't see how they as well can give permission. By the way Adam, it was Tesco's Wind Turbine I was referring to. Edited November 29, 2013 by foxy
Adam Hogg Posted November 30, 2013 Report Posted November 30, 2013 Well you heard it for the horses mouth foxy that if Tesco's don't make a move by February 2014 their planning Permission is out the window and hopefully we get the Gap Site and car park back, Malcolm has been pushing this and I will be backing him up on it.
Chris88 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Posted December 4, 2013 Is it too late to do anything about the Old School site? Or is there still legal wrangling going on? I remember signing a petition maybe a couple of years ago but I've never heard anything since. Also, what's the issue with the development of the gap site? Or is it because Tesco haven't done anything to improve it? Sorry, as you can probably tell, I'm out of the loop here.
Malcolm Robinson Posted December 4, 2013 Report Posted December 4, 2013 School site went to planning appeal and basically developer wiped the floor with our planners! Because of time delay he got the old 5 years permission not the current 3. Tesco was supposed to build there and have 5-6 new shops with offices above on the front. These to be starter units for sme development. Problem I am trying to publicise is that if we gave Tesco the Gap site and car park in exchange for an interest in these new shops and offices and they don't get built have we just given away the most strategic development sites in the middle of the Town for nothing?
Maggie/915 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Posted December 4, 2013 Is it Arrogance Ignorance or just plain Greed.They want the best return for not doing anything.
Adam Hogg Posted December 4, 2013 Report Posted December 4, 2013 For those who don't know Tesco's Planning permission runs out in February 2014, Hopefully if the planning runs out Tesco's will have to hand the land back under the agreement they have, but I will not hold my breath.
Chris88 Posted December 5, 2013 Report Posted December 5, 2013 So when does the 5 years run out for the school site? Is there literally nothing that can be done to prevent its demolition? Those flats that are planned for the site are huge. The view of the wonderful church tower and clock will be completely lost. They will dominate the area. I seem to remember that the developers initially just wanted to convert the old school into houses but got turned down. That somehow seems a much more preferable solution now. I may be wrong there though.
Malcolm Robinson Posted December 5, 2013 Report Posted December 5, 2013 Chris, When the planning inspectorate made their ruling they granted the developer their first application. Obviously in the first application you put in everything you might want and then negotiate down to what the local planners will allow. Due to what looked to be incompetence the local planners lost hands down! Its probably only halfway through its term at present.
Adam Hogg Posted December 5, 2013 Report Posted December 5, 2013 So when does the 5 years run out for the school site? Is there literally nothing that can be done to prevent its demolition? Those flats that are planned for the site are huge. The view of the wonderful church tower and clock will be completely lost. They will dominate the area. I seem to remember that the developers initially just wanted to convert the old school into houses but got turned down. That somehow seems a much more preferable solution now. I may be wrong there though.The only thing that could be done to maybe save the school/church hall is for the county council to try a compulsory purchase order.But that costs a lot of money, however a County Councillor has stated that at the entrance to St Benet Biscop one of the houses there could be compulsory purchased then knocked down to allow the buses to enter easier.So the County Council does have money for a compulsory purchase order but I doubt they are interested in the old School/church hall.
Keith Scantlebury Posted December 7, 2013 Report Posted December 7, 2013 I heard yesterday that the development on the old Elliots garage site is running £250, 000 over budget now. Could Bedlington be lumbered with a half built eyesore if the developer runs out of cash ?
Adam Hogg Posted December 7, 2013 Report Posted December 7, 2013 Could Bedlington be lumbered with a half built eyesore if the developer runs out of cash ?That is the Question Keith.
Maggie/915 Posted December 7, 2013 Report Posted December 7, 2013 On the Agenda for the 14th Nov 2013.Planning ref 13/00373Also 13 / 00229The West Bedlington Town Council discussed comments / responses to the land South West of 21 Front Street.Responses were due 28th Oct 13.As this thread was not started until after the response date, I guess no one saw any publicity.
Chris88 Posted December 9, 2013 Report Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) It would be utterly insane to pull down a house just to let the buses in. A wider road at that location would be horrible to cross whilst keeping an eye out for traffic. The buses should be able to go into the school via the bottom exit, turn around in there and head back out the same way. Unfortunately, since I left they've built all over the bottom area. They've been managing for years anyway. Tough luck that the Council let the school get so vast in such a poorly accessible location! Edited December 9, 2013 by Chris88
Adam Hogg Posted December 9, 2013 Report Posted December 9, 2013 It would be utterly insane to pull down a house just to let the buses in. A wider road at that location would be horrible to cross whilst keeping an eye out for traffic. The buses should be able to go into the school via the bottom exit, turn around in there and head back out the same way. Unfortunately, since I left they've built all over the bottom area. They've been managing for years anyway. Tough luck that the Council let the school get so vast in such a poorly accessible location!The wonders of the Planning Department again.
Maggie/915 Posted December 9, 2013 Report Posted December 9, 2013 We tried to access the Smithy today without success.After re reading we will try again.It seemed dodgy to walk down someone's drive on Front Street.Towers Close will be changed for ever.
paul mann Posted December 11, 2013 Report Posted December 11, 2013 It obviously has historic merit and Bedlington should do something to hang onto its past. Maybe raising funds by public subscription would help. A good old fashioned petition to save the stables might help if the council realises a lot of locals care about it. That means standing at a busy place with a petition form and collecting signatures no matter what the weather. If Bedlington has no Historical Preservation Society perhaps the restored stables would make a good location.
Recommended Posts
Create a free account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now