Pro-Trump Petition

[threegee]

Donald Trump should make a State Visit to the United Kingdom.

It's going up faster than any one I've ever followed.  Pity the petitioner can't spell!

The interesting thing for me is will the BBC ever mention it; they've been doing a magnificent job of promoting the Corbynista one for days now.

[Pete]

Signed it and agree with you on the BBC bit but its not just the BBC, local media seem to be anti Trump and anti brexit.

Edited January 31, 2017 by Pete

[moe19]

I also signed it I thinks its unbelievable how the Biased Broadcasting Corporation and Sky are spending 24/7 Trump bashing (with a sprinkle  of  air time to Luvies remoning )  without giving Trump supporters views a mention.

I also thought our overpaid underworked politicians would have had more important things to debate

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/29/poll-nearly-half-america-voters-support-trumps-immigration-order

[Alan Edgar (Eggy1948)]

Signed -  and the wife signed without me asking her.

[mercuryg]

Of course he should have a state visit; doesn't mean I agree with him, though!

[Les Dixon]

The British jump on the bandwagon brigade, probably the same morons who watch and vote on the X Factor.

Cheers, I'll vote for the state visit and to hell with the morons.

[Symptoms]

Auntie mentioned it on Newsnight last night.

This is all 'wind and piss' and pressing a button on their PCs is a poor substitute for all the fat, lazy basta*ds not to get out into the open air and join the marches.  Poor show, I say!

Trumpet is no worse than many of the tyrants previously wined and dined by Betty Saxe-Coburg-Gotha; let him in so the fat, lazy basta*ds have the opportunity to stand on the Mall and shout at him.

Je suis Sym

[Les Dixon]

Parliament will debate this petition if enough sign it.

Yes it's easier, but more affective and direct, it is the 21st century after all.

Edited February 1, 2017 by Les Dixon
Spelling

[mercuryg]

15 hours ago, Les Dixon said:

Parliament will debate this petition if enough sign it.

Yes it's easier, but more affective and direct, it is the 21st century after all.

Contrary to popular belief, at no point is parliament obliged to debate a petition, merely to consider doing so.

[moe19]

They can debate until they are blue in the face, the top and bottom of it is we need the yanks more than they need us and Don will have his day.

Lets face it a lot worse than Don has graced the palaces dinner tables,      

[threegee]

2 hours ago, mercuryg said:

Contrary to popular belief, at no point is parliament obliged to debate a petition, merely to consider doing so.

Contrary to parliamentary belief, the British public are sovereign and they have no divine right to do what's in their own interests (under the guise of their alleged moral superiority).  Gone are the days when they can pedal the line that we need them to do our thinking for us.  We now need to remind them of this at every single opportunity.

We've always managed to stave off bloody revolution in this country by the elites having the sense to give enough ground, but this collection of drones haven't got the basic horse sense of their predecessors, and still don't realise that their posturing impresses no one.  The utterly pathetic "debate" in the Commons yesterday is a case in point.

[Malcolm Robinson]

HMG............

[mercuryg]

1 hour ago, Malcolm Robinson said:

HMG............

That's right, see number 6 - it will be considered; not necessarily debated.

[mercuryg]

21 hours ago, threegee said:

Contrary to parliamentary belief, the British public are sovereign and they have no divine right to do what's in their own interests (under the guise of their alleged moral superiority).  Gone are the days when they can pedal the line that we need them to do our thinking for us.  We now need to remind them of this at every single opportunity.

We've always managed to stave off bloody revolution in this country by the elites having the sense to give enough ground, but this collection of drones haven't got the basic horse sense of their predecessors, and still don't realise that their posturing impresses no one.  The utterly pathetic "debate" in the Commons yesterday is a case in point.

I agree with you 3G.