Colin Nichol Posted October 7 Posted October 7 I have today discovered that my paternal grandparents (James Nichol and Mary Alice Nichol, nee Snowdon) had their first child (Annie Margaret) on 31st May 1891. Sadly, she did not survive. She was buried in Cambois Cemetery, January 1892. I am 76 now and I cannot get my head around the fact that I didn't know anything about this. I don't know where Cambois Cemetery was in 1892, nor if she even had a headstone. We moved to West Sussex in 1987 (worst thing we ever did), so I can't do any local research. Can anyone please fill in any blanks for me? 1
Canny lass Posted Wednesday at 23:38 Posted Wednesday at 23:38 (edited) Hi @Colin Nichol Welcome to the forum. The parish of Cambois was originally part of St Cuthbert's, Bedlington, it was a small parish served by the vicar of Sleekburn and a non-stipendiary priest. The Cambois church, St Andrews, is a small church built in 1860. It was formerly the mission church of St Peter's Church, West Sleekburn until it closed in the 1990s. As a mission church it did not have a graveyard so burials took place at St Peter's, West Sleekburn. Cambois, St Peter: Records of baptisms 1865-1936, marriages 1866-1998 and burials 1874-1966 are available at Northumberland Archives Service. P.S.Did you know that James and Mary Alice lost a second child within the first 10 years of their marriage? Edited Wednesday at 23:41 by Canny lass 1
Colin Nichol Posted Thursday at 09:25 Author Posted Thursday at 09:25 Thank you very much, Canny Lass for this information. I appreciate the time you have spent, in answering my plea for help. So, I assume that Annie Margaret is buried in the cemetery of St Peter's Church at West Sleekburn. I have had a look at the web site of Northumberland Archives at Woodhorn but, to be honest, I am not sure how to navigate it. It doesn't seem to accept a person's name as a search criterion. As I said earlier, we live in Sussex, so I can't get to Woodhorn in person. I am intrigued by the mention of another child's death. I knew nothing about this. Can I be cheeky and ask if you have any information, regarding this? Thank you again. Colin 1
Canny lass Posted Thursday at 09:53 Posted Thursday at 09:53 (edited) Hi again @Colin Nichol. The 1911 census form filled in by James himself gives the information related to the length of the marriage and the number of children living and dead. I also would assume that St Peters is the burial place of Annie Margaret. However, money was tight in those days so she may be buried in another person's grave as she was so young. It was common practice for an infant to be placed inside the coffin of the next adult to be buried. Edited Thursday at 09:58 by Canny lass 1
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 07:36 Author Posted yesterday at 07:36 I apologise for my late reply. I got volunteered to tile our daughter-in-law's kitchen, which took a little while. Once again, I am extremely grateful for the trouble you went to and the information you have provided. Thank you. 2
Canny lass Posted yesterday at 17:38 Posted yesterday at 17:38 Pleased to have been of help. I think I may have found the other child who died between 1901 and 1911. I believe that James and Mary Alice had another daughter born in the first quarter of 1897. That would fit in nicely with the gap between the births of George and James. There are no other gaps which would allow for a pregnancy between 1901 and 1911. The firstborn daughter, Annie Margaret Nichol born 1891, was given her maternal grandmother’s name and her birth was registered as Annie Margaret. What I believe to be the second daughter, born 1897, was also given her maternal grandmother’s name but without the diminutive form. Her birth was registered as Ann Margaret Nichol. She died the following year and her death was registered in March 1898 but then using the name Annie Margaret Nichol. She was also buried in Cambois. That parents ‘recycled’ names isn’t uncommon, especially if it was the name of a grandparent or parent. I myself am a perfect example. My mother gave birth to a daughter in 1931 and gave that daughter her maternal grandmother’s name – Annie. The child, Annie, lived only a few months. I was born in 1947 and was also given my maternal grandmother’s name though without the diminutive form – Ann. Like you, I never knew anything about Annie (or another brother dead before my birth) until I was in my 70s. They were never mentioned. The discovery of a sister named Annie explained something that had puzzled me for years. My mother always called me Ann. Everybody else called me Annie. My mother had one Annie and one Ann and for a mother the one could never replace the other. If you would like the birth, death and burial indexes for Ann Margaret born 1897 let me know and I’ll post them to your in-box (the envelope in the top tight-hand corner of the screen). 1
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 17:53 Author Posted yesterday at 17:53 Ann, Yes, please. That would be amazing and thank you again for all of your help. Regards. Colin
loopylou Posted yesterday at 18:20 Posted yesterday at 18:20 (edited) Hi, I had a look through the Cambois burials on FreeREG and was wondering if James and Mary Alice might’ve sadly lost another child? Their youngest William doesn’t appear in the 1921 census with them, but there is this burial. William Nichol buried 25 January 1914, aged 5, residence Wansbeck Terrace Sleekburn. Lou Edited yesterday at 18:20 by loopylou
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 18:30 Author Posted yesterday at 18:30 Ann, Yes, please. That would be amazing and thank you again for all of your help. Regards. Colin
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 18:38 Author Posted yesterday at 18:38 loopylou, Thank you for your message. The most recent information I have for the family is the 1911 Census, when they were living at 39 North Row, West Sleekburn. William was 2 years old. I can't remember anyone mentioning an Uncle William Will, Bill or Billy, so I suspect that he didn't survive.
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 19:51 Author Posted yesterday at 19:51 loopyloo, I have revisited my family history documents and found out that William did die of tuberculosis on 23rd November 1914 in Wanstead Cottage Hospital. 1
Colin Nichol Posted yesterday at 19:52 Author Posted yesterday at 19:52 Just now, Colin Nichol said: loopyloo, I have revisited my family history documents and found out that William did die of tuberculosis on 23rd November 1914 in Wansbeck Cottage Hospital.
loopylou Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) @Colin Nichol How sad. I should correct that William was buried 25 Oct 1914, not January. Don’t know where I got that month from! Found his obituary in Newcastle Evening Chronicle, 24 Oct 1914, page 2. NICHOL - At Wansbeck Cottage, Stakeford, 23inst, aged 5 years and 19 months, William, the beloved son of James and Alice Nichol. Interment at Cambois Churchyard on Sunday at 3.30pm. Friends please accept this, the only intimation. Morpeth Herald, March 5 1898 page 8: At West Sleekburn on 28th ult., Ann Margaret, daughter of Mr. James Nichol. Morpeth Herald, 23 January 1893, page 8: At Stakeford, 16th inst., aged 7 months, Annie Margaret, daughter of Mr. James Nichol. Edited 22 hours ago by loopylou
Colin Nichol Posted 14 hours ago Author Posted 14 hours ago Wow! Thank you for this information. I was totally unaware of these obituaries. I am very grateful. Regards. Colin
Canny lass Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 12 hours ago, loopylou said: Morpeth Herald, 23 January 1893, page 8: At Stakeford, 16th inst., aged 7 months, Annie Margaret, daughter of Mr. James Nichol. Hi @loopylou, could you check the year of that obituary for me (my BNA is down for maintainence at the minute). The death record that I found was 1892. If it was 1893 then it throws my research of balance a bit. Thanks in advance.
Canny lass Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Hi @Colin Nichol. In reply to your message: when searching for a child death without knowing the name it's always worth looking up the child's grandparents. The Victorians were usually quite consistent in naming their offspring: 1st son named after his maternal grandfather 1st daughter named after her paternal grandmother 2nd son named after his paternal grandfather 2nd daughter named after her maternal grandmother Thereafter came parents names and important relatives. Towards the end of the Victorian era the order of naming wasn't any longer so strictly followed but the practice of using the names of just those relatives lived on into the early 20th century. Ann Margaret seems to have been a name worth preserving among the Snowdons. James and Mary Alice's first child, Annie Margaret was given her maternal grandmother's name. That maternal grandmother had also given her first daughter that name. (that child also died before the age of 15). The name was then 'vacant' for future children therefore I searched for it in the birth index during the years between the births of George and James where the time-span allowed for a pregnancy. Of course, you would need to obtain a birth certificate to verify that James and Mary Alice are the parents but I think the chances are good. Hope this explains the need for the census documents.
loopylou Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Canny lass said: Hi @loopylou, could you check the year of that obituary for me (my BNA is down for maintainence at the minute). The death record that I found was 1892. If it was 1893 then it throws my research of balance a bit. Thanks in advance. @Canny lass Must be one of those days for me, full of typos. It is 1892, just had a double check. 1
Colin Nichol Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago The mother of Mary Alice Nichol (nee Snowdon) was Alice Snowdon, who was also Scottish.
Colin Nichol Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago This conversation has prompted me to revisit the information I have for Mary Alice Snowdon. On one of the Census records I have, she showed her place of birth as Northumberland. On another, it was Scotland. On another, it was Plashetts, Northumberland, which is the village that lies under Kielder reservoir. For some reason, years ago, I accepted Scotland as being correct. I may have been wrong to do so. I have searched on familysearch.org and there is a Mary Alice Snowdon, born in 1869. Her birthplace is shown as Bellingham, which is close to Plashetts. Have I been incorrect for all these years? Why did I accept Scotland as being correct? Colin
Recommended Posts
Create a free account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now