Jump to content

Stephen

Members
  • Posts

    150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Stephen

  1. The Annual Meeting of WEST BEDLINGTON TOWN COUNCIL will be held at Bedlington Salvation Army Hall, Hartford Road West, Bedlington on Thursday 12 May 2011 at 6 pm

    The agenda for the meeting is set out below.

    1) ELECTION OF THE MAYOR FOR YEAR 2011 / 12

    2) TO RECEIVE THE MAYOR'S DECLARATION OF ACCEPTANCE

    3) ELECTION OF DEPUTY MAYOR

    4) APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

    5) DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST

    6) THE COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE THE INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT

    Mr Richard Slater, the internal auditor of the council, will make a short presentation.

    7) THE COUNCIL ARE REQUESTED TO ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE ANNUAL ACCOUNTS AND THE ANNUAL RETURN FOR YEAR 2010 / 11

    8) DATE OF NEXT MEETING

    West Bedlington Town Council Meeting will be held Thursday 9 June at 6pm in the Salvation Army Hall

    Following this the Annual Meeting of the Town will be held, agenda:

    1) WELCOME TO THE MEETING

    2) TO RECEIVE THE ANNUAL REPORT OF WEST BEDLINGTON TOWN COUNCIL

    3) GUEST SPEAKER

    - Ms A Germany of H.M. Courts Service

    - Police Report

    4) OPEN FORUM

    5) PUBLIC QUESTION TIME

  2. The Lib Dems would always have lost some votes by going into any coalition, depending on whether the voters preferred them to work with Labour or the Conservatives. The cuts and tax rises necessary to reduce the deficit were never going to be vote winners either. But it's the image the party now has of broken promises that has been most damaging. The increase of tuition fees was a complete reversal of promises before the election. Looking at individual council wards in Newcastle, the ones with big student populations changed from Lib Dem to Labour. I expect this will have been repeated in Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham, Sheffield and other university cities.

    The results in Scotland show that there are a lot of people who want to vote for someone other than Labour or the Conservatives though, this has come as a nasty surprise to Labour who expected all the disaffected Lib Dems to go their way. Perhaps this election has been a big missed opportunity for UKIP in England?

    Malcolm, I'm a supporter of electoral reform but I can't see anything in those results that suggest that people want reform of some kind just not AV. It was a crushing defeat in almost every constituency and council area, and on a higher turnout than expected.

    There are no easy answers, it is still a dangerous time for a country to be in debt as Iceland, Latvia, Greece, Ireland and Portugal can all testify (and even the USA is now being threatened with a downgrade of their credit rating). Ed Balls' way of borrowing and spending more and more money assuming that it will lead to growth is the policy that helped get us into this mess in the first place. You're right that we need new ideas for targeted investment in growth based on something real, not a government pyramid scheme.

  3. When LDs talk about "wasted votes" they mean that if all their votes were spread across the whole electorate, and were used to select winners, then they'd gain a lot more seats

    ...

    AV is a license for wholesale tactical voting rather than votes on principal! Any party which hasn't got the clarity of purpose and policies to need to depend on tactical voting to get elected doesn't deserve office! This incidentally is where I part company with the UKIP; just like the LDs they are in favour of it just as long and so far as it's useful to them!

    I don't understand this argument at all, please explain how you think AV will increase tactical voting.

    A transferable vote system like AV allows someone who supports UKIP in principle to cast their vote for UKIP without worrying that their vote will be wasted, as if UKIP do end up coming last or near the bottom then their vote can be transferred to their next preference. I'll make a bet with you that if AV is adopted, we'll see UKIP coming ahead of main party candidates in some constituencies.

    AV doesn't make tactical voting impossible, but it is more difficult to work out how to do it and for political parties to explain to their supporters what to do. I've seen people argue that AV doesn't eliminate tactical voting (true, which is why I used the word 'reduces') but I've never seen anyone in the No campaign or anywhere else try to argue that it makes tactical voting more likely.

  4. Pete,

    I am not advocating for AV just putting the info out there so people can have some understanding and choice.

    Personally I think its a pile of steaming horse sxxt! The current system needs change being more fitting to the 19th century than anything resembling a decent system for the 21st but what is being proposed is a very poor option and probably the very least Dave could appease Nick with.

    I think its a very small improvement so I'll be voting for it. I know there are some like David Owen who think that by voting this down they'll be offered something better next time, but there were people who thought the same about the Regional Assembly referendum and I don't see any prospect of an improved version of that being offered again. (Yes, I know there will be people who think AV is worse than our current system as there were many who didn't want any form of regional government)

    The reasons I think it is a small improvement - it reduces wasted votes and tactical voting, and it means MPs should have to pass a winning post of 50% to get elected. That doesn't happen now, I remember a Lib Dem MP being elected in Inverness on 26% of the vote!

  5. What would happen if 80% of the voters voted "None of the Above" and is this why its not in place?

    If it was just a way of registering disapproval, then probably very little. I've always preferred the idea of Re-Open Nominations (something I've seen in student elections) where if 'RON' wins, there has to be another election with new candidates.

  6. It was run as a "do as I say cooncil" and "not a do as I do" .............and its been proven

    I just hope its not wheels within wheels and the thieving buggers get off with it.

    Its no different than someone coming in to YOUR house and thieving money from you......... would they get off with it if caught? I think not.

    It's worse than that - at least a burglar doesn't come back for more every year, but the people involved here will get that extra money in their pensions for years to come.

    • Like 2
  7. I don't think he is the highest paid on the NCC books..........

    But you have to make savings where you can these days......

    ??????????????

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/11/11/northumberland-county-council-slammed-for-cutting-back-on-remembrance-wreaths-115875-22708115/

    I very strongly agree with the County on this, not because of the amount of money involved which is not large in the scheme of things but because of the principle. Wreaths laid on behalf of Northumberland are one thing but if councillors want to lay wreaths from them personally then they should pay for them personally. Having the public pay for their wreaths makes a mockery of the gesture.

    • Like 2
  8. Thing is sizsells when we are all complaining about lack of facilities in our town we might just be about to have a small glimpse into why..........

    Can't quite believe the CPS stance?

    I wasn't on WDC at the time this happened so it is news to me, but it doesn't surprise me. I'll be following any action by NCC with interest.

    In general it is depressing that the CPS are not actively trying to enforce the law. They seem to be relying on councillors to hold senior officers to account, and while that might seem reasonable what can the public do if the councillors fail to do that?

  9. Koast are giving a lot of support, they are involved because they offered. SNRG of course have only just had their funding success very recently. I notice also that the Blyth event has sponsorship from big name retailers e.g. Argos and Asda. I know many local traders have donated prizes (via Koast, if I knew the details I'd give them a plug here) but haven't heard anything yet from the biggest national retailer in town.

  10. See Newbiggin's got Philippa Tomson off Tyne Tess TV...........

    (Don't quite know if she is a weather girl, roving reporter, presenter, MD or general dogsbody she seems to do so many jobs......?)

    Newbiggin put up their share of the council tax by 50% last year. If we did that then I'm sure we could afford someone more famous next year. I know you don't want us to put your council tax up Malcolm but I'm sure Merlin and Monsta will happily pay it for you!

  11. The Salvation Army also have a number of events this Christmas.

    Doorstep Pictures mobile cinema

    08/12/10, 5.30pm Toy Story 3 (U) £2 per person

    Pantomime (Sleeping Beauty) presented by The Panto Company

    13/12/10, 6.30pm

    Carolling in the market place

    18/12/10, 10.00am

    Please contact them for further details at:

    Bedlington Salvation Army Community Centre,

    Hartford Road West, Bedlington, NE22 6HU

    01670 829356

  12. I thought the programme did a good job of trying to get across the scale of the debt, I often hear people saying that all we need to do is cut a few million off MPs wages and expenses or money sent overseas. Easy targets but it would be like trying to empty the overflowing bath in the programme with a thimble. The debt is so huge though that it is understandable that most people just don't understand what a trillion is. The really shocking thing was the MPs (of all parties) who had no idea how big our debt was either.

    I thought they overdid their argument about how much better Britain was as a low tax economy in the 19th Century though. We had a huge technological advantage back then and also a huge Empire to export to (and the ability and willingness to open up markets like China by force).

×
×
  • Create New...