Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  monsta said:
shouldn't bedlington have a capital B?

It's 2.0 don't you know?

Point taken though should probably change it.

Guest mrsvic
Posted
  monsta said:
shouldn't bedlington have a capital B? mmm looks templatey!

does it need a capital, if it's a website without a capital?

ooh, I don't know the protocol on this branch of lingistics... :owhat would Noam Chomsky do? :o

I like the picture too!

Keep up the good work GGGG! (and good diversion tactics too!)

Posted
  mrsvic said:
(and good diversion tactics too!)

Yeah the Bedderberg Group just got a little larger.

Guest mrsvic
Posted
  Fourgee™ said:
Yeah the Bedderberg Group just got a little larger.

:D

Posted
  Blank said:
Mrsvic is breaking the forum rules by posting a smiley without any explanation!...

You want an explanation?! Let me dispel the "ugly rumour" that I know what the ^$%^%$ is going on here.

Anyway, you know what happened when Manchester overreached themselves and made the B too big. It all ended in tears and recriminations (coincidentally about lack of support). I say let bedlington's own Thomas Heatherwick do his own thing. It won't cost a couple of Mill either!

Posted
  threegee said:
You want an explanation?! Let me dispel the "ugly rumour" that I know what the ^$%^%$ is going on here.

Anyway, you know what happened when Manchester overreached themselves and made the B too big. It all ended in tears and recriminations (coincidentally about lack of support). I say let bedlington's own Thomas Heatherwick do his own thing. It won't cost a couple of Mill either!

what are you talking about? manchesters b was an art installation not a capital letter on a web site! big difference :D anyway it should be a capital so people dont think bedlington is full if thick scruffs with bad grammar! :huh::lol::lol::lol:

Posted

I say that those who are able to maintain good standards in grammar, syntax, punctuation and half-a-hundred other rules should continue to do so; we of the GCE 'O'level English generation have a duty of care to the Forum. A word of warning ... do we really want to leave this place in the hands of the entry-level communicators or their spawn, those only capable of using texting structure?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  Hamburger Pimp said:
Are we in the future now?

Very bauhaus, the new, clean lines and the restrained greys and blacks.

I likes it.

Consider it a work in progress. :D

Posted
  threegee said:
Consider it a work in progress. :D

Yeah it's not quite finished because the content writers were being impatient :P

Keep in mind as well that this is purely an image revamp on the forums front, functionally it should be identical... for now.

Posted

And while we're on the subject of content anybody is welcome to submit articles for publication.

Posted

bah! why's it grey is that to reflect the town? cleaner design maybe, dull colours yes! i prefered the white and blue :mellow:

Posted
  monsta said:
bah! why's it grey is that to reflect the town? cleaner design maybe, dull colours yes! i prefered the white and blue :mellow:

Plenty of opportunities to try your own ideas out coming soon monsta. I look forward to seeing the results!

Posted

I like the look of the site now, not quite sure of the grey but i could get used to it.

Posted
  Fourgee™ said:
OK reverted to a white background, thoughts?

Really don't like it when it's all white.

Posted
  Blank said:
Really don't like it when it's all white.

Yeah wasn't supposed to happen that :) the pitfalls of editing a live site.

Posted

The site looks fine the way it is now. Is it a lighter grey? or have my eyes just got used to it?

Create a free account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...