mobius Posted February 16, 2010 Report Posted February 16, 2010 There's probably no-one here who hasn't seen Cerebus, the blue aardvark who has graced the concrete wall of the bridge over the spine road for over 20 years.see photo hereWell, never say the Council don't get their man - he's now been painted over. A terrible shame. 1
Mr Darn Posted February 16, 2010 Report Posted February 16, 2010 I actually agree! it is a shame.There's a fine line between Graffitti and Art. Something thats been there for so long as Graffitti, and has had no complaints, should have been left alone in my eyes.Then again, perhaps someone complained??Myself, i liked it. I think it should have stayed. 1
Malcolm Robinson Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 I think some of this sort of stuff is certainly artwork deriving from the 'pop art' movements of the 50's. Having said that it is unfortunate where certain exponents of the craft choose to exhibit their work!
Mr Darn Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Definatly.It was a great piece of artwork, but the location could have distracted drivers passing the bridge, with a potential accident risk.Was it catalogued before it was painted over? A few photographs have to exist that could be stored on Bedlington.co.uk?
Andy Millne Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Doesn't he have a twin on the wall by the Gap site?
Mr Darn Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 I remember that wall being rife with Graffitti, but i forget whats there... Photo anyone?
Andy Millne Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 I've just walked past it and didn't take a photo, sorry. Will next time I pass. It's got some "good" graffiti and some pointless scrawling over the top of it. Pretty sure there's an aardvark in there. 1
Owen Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 sorry but normal people complain about graffiti and when the Council do pull ther finger out and get rid of it..well i dont need to say anymore, there place for "art work" and there is Graffiti. 1
Blank Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 There's a fine line between Graffitti and Art. There's no difference between the two if whoever did it didn't have permission in the first place.If I want to view 'art' I'll go to an appropriate place to see it.
Andy Millne Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 there place for "art work" and there is Graffiti.If I want to view 'art' I'll go to an appropriate place to see it.You wouldn't be complaining if Banksy "tagged" your wall.http://frigginloon.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/banksy-turns-derelict-pub-into-valuable-real-estate/
Mr Darn Posted February 17, 2010 Report Posted February 17, 2010 Thats the fine line tho... permission.
Monsta® Posted February 19, 2010 Report Posted February 19, 2010 I'd complain! he's complete !*!@# anyway! and theres a place for spray paint did they cover the severed heed on the other side of the road?
Recommended Posts
Create a free account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now