February 13, 201313 yr http://www.london-ga...ington terriersApparently the Chairman is issuing a statement on Wednesday.Edit: Damn the typos when I use my phone to post!
February 13, 201313 yr Author Don't know mercury, haven't been involved with the club for over a year. Hopefully this can be avoided, will be interesting to read the chairmans statement.
February 13, 201313 yr Its a winding up order, which if I am correct means the creditor has run out of patience with the debtor and is looking to maybe get pence in the pound back.
February 13, 201313 yr Might not be too bad...http://www.bedlingtonterriersfc.com/statement-from-the-chairman/Fingers crossed!
February 13, 201313 yr Name & Registered Office:BEDLINGTON TERRIERS FOOTBALL CLUB C.I.C.17 FRANCES VILLESCOTLAND GATECHOPPINGTONNORTHUMBERLANDNE62 5STCompany No. 08390003Status: Active Date of Incorporation: 05/02/2013 Country of Origin: United Kingdom Company Type: Community Interest Company Nature of Business (SIC): None Supplied Accounting Reference Date: 28/02 Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED) Next Accounts Due: 05/11/2014 Last Return Made Up To: Next Return Due: 05/03/2014 Bet no one tells his honour about this a week on Friday! cf.:ASHMOOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (In Liquidation)RWB CONSTRUCTION LTD (Dissolved) Are there really two Mr Ritchie Wharton's born three years apart? If not someone really should tell Companies House!I like this song:
February 15, 201313 yr Forgive me for being pedantic, but that 'chairmans announcement' is an utter abomination. Grammatically and in context it reads as though it has been written by a primary school kid; one should never include an exclamation mark in an official, professional announcement such as this - it smacks of ridicule and sensationalism - and, to point out one immediate error, anyone with any knowledge of grammar should be aware the number three should always be written as a word. I could go on, but if the gentleman in question wishes to present a professional image, perhaps he should ask someone to proof his work?
February 15, 201313 yr Forgive me for being pedantic, but that 'chairmans announcement' is an utter abomination. Grammatically and in context it reads as though it has been written by a primary school kid; one should never include an exclamation mark in an official, professional announcement such as this - it smacks of ridicule and sensationalism - and, to point out one immediate error, anyone with any knowledge of grammar should be aware the number three should always be written as a word. I could go on, but if the gentleman in question wishes to present a professional image, perhaps he should ask someone to proof his work?Could I interest you in this thread Merc?
February 15, 201313 yr ...if the gentleman in question wishes to present a professional image, perhaps he should ask someone to proof his work?It's worse than that merc! He states he was told three times there was no debt. A senior official of a company is required to find these things out for themselves and not to take what others say at face value. If he can't read his own company's accounts, or find someone who can, then he shouldn't have taken the job in the first place!He should be presenting the full facts to the club, and not coming up with excuses that read like a kiddie's sickie! A competent company chairman would call a meeting of members at the first opportunity. In such a serious matter it should probably be a meeting of all club members and not just significant stakeholders. Bedlington deserves better than this!
February 15, 201313 yr All this should have come out in "due diligence". If it was hidden then there is a legal claim. If the incoming administration didn't do due diligence then 'caveat emptor.' For the £15 grand being talked about I would have thought there is much more to this than the sum involved?
February 16, 201313 yr I thought Due Diligence was a cowboy No thats Due with an 'l' Keef1..........This isn't..........is it?
February 16, 201313 yr Could I interest you in this thread Merc?http://www.bedlingto...c/4200-writers/Thanks Brett, I've already been in contact with Malcolm regards this.
February 16, 201313 yr ...though both cowboys and rustling may well be involved somewhere!All this should have come out in "due diligence". If it was hidden then there is a legal claim. If the incoming administration didn't do due diligence then 'caveat emptor.'Even if there was no emptoring - and the board were appointees - then they should have/be doing a substantial amount of caveating! The chairman and his board need to do some quick revision on their legal responsibilities. Here is a good starting place for their revision. Paragraph 11 would be particularly relevant, and doesn't provide for I-didn't-knows/nobody-told-mes. Paragraphs 16 to 20 might focus minds.For the £15 grand being talked about I would have thought there is much more to this than the sum involved?My original post seems to indicate so. I never watched Blackadder, but didn't it popularise a phrase about planning?
February 16, 201313 yr No thats Due with an 'l' Keef1..........Malcolm, where did you get my photo from
February 16, 201313 yr I intended to post on here with regards to the "Chairmans" statement a few days ago but thought best not to, but I have to say one thing, I,m at a loss as to someone taking on the responsibilities of the position and NOT being fully converse with the finances of ANY business let alone a football club with let us say a "history" as The Terriers have had in recent years.Just an opinion of course.
Create a free account or sign in to comment