threegee

Cast your mind back to 1st January 2014 and those two Labour MPs standing at the airport to meet and greet the single Romanian "car washer" on the first flight in. A great PR stunt by Labour, but in the context of what has happened since the joke is on them, not on the people who accurately predicted a migrancy crisis, and were the subject of the mockery. There's some good jokes to be had about Turkey right now, but for some strange reason the left is no longer keen on striking at the empty goal.

Easy to see why she never uses her married name - far too adjectival! Anyway, conclusive proof that the good people of Morley must have far higher IQs than Pontefract folk. But... oh dear... that's somewhere us Wansbeck people shouldn't be venturing - just yet!

Here's a balanced explanation of why big business backs Remain, and most small to medium sided business doesn't, from a city economist who has no particular axe to grind either way. Five minutes reading this will likely be more illuminating than many hours of TV "debate". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/03/06/exactly-why-is-big-business-so-in-favourof-the-eu/ For those who have an aversion to links: the takeaway points are that the EU depresses wages, a fact already blurted out by Remain campaign boss Stuart Rose in one of his too-honest-for-his-own-campaign moments. Also, that the drop in Sterling is a blessing in disguise, and that it's what Dave's puppet, BoE Governor Mark Carney, should be trying to achieve - if only he wasn't so busy dancing to Dave's tune and issuing all sorts of idiotic warnings. Carney been wildly wrong in just about every other calculation so far, so has now set himself on course for an entirely unbroken record. All we need now is a rational explanation of why comrade Corbyn backs policies that indisputably force the wages of UK workers down. All his passionate speeches against the EU have recently been expunged from his website. I'm not going to waste anyone's time speculating precisely why, but feel free to offer your own explanation.

Of course, but that doesn't preclude an element of truth, and it's in the best tradition of Jewish humour. On the flipside the stoical denial of creeping Islamification - being equally absurd - also has an element of humour.

I think that once you are prepared to tolerate people losing their jobs for what they believe in you are creating a sick society. The left is very quick to point out intolerance in others but is always prepared to turn a blind eye whenever "the ends justify the means". Therein lies Stalinism. If you can't make your case by argument and have to resort to intrigue then you most probably have no case. Cameron has no case, and the same is now true for Corbyn - but just at the moment Corbyn is keeping very quiet and letting Cameron and his big business cronies do Labour's dirty work. It's dirty work because what they are all about is against the interests of the people who put them where they are, and is predicated on lies. You asked!

A year might not be deliverable Eggy! GERMANY BANS SAUSAGES: Pork banned in cafes and schools to 'not offend refugees'

The plot thickens! There's an "interesting" transcript of a phone call to Dave's lair on the Torygraph site. Thing is this is just one of very many favours Dave has been calling in in his increasing desperation. If the truth were known about what was being said (well, not actually said, these things are hinted at) the resulting scandal would shine so powerful a light on how this country is really run that calls for constitutional change would become deafening.

Hadn't you noticed Maggie? It's no longer about a "State of War between the parties" it's a State of War within the parties. It's a war between the Internationalist Elites with their hands on all the levers of power, propaganda and misinformation, and the Proles! Read the prophet of these sad times, George Orwell. Whoops, I feel a link coming on! No no, I'm resisting.... At the current time you can throw in fear, "uncertainty", and doubt (of our country's abilities and place in the world) as tools of that control.

It's looking like this is going to badly backfire on the do-anything claim-anything Eurofanatics! Longworth wasn't exactly a strong outer, but he's now concluded that it's the only way. Politico-speak: BoJo isn't sad about it at all. But the gifts to the OUT campaign just keep on coming. Every time IN campaign chairman Rose opens his mouth there's a gift too - Remain needs to replace him or completely gag him!

Ah, yes, it all comes back to me now. Queen Elizabeth fancied an Indian takeaway so Walt thought he'd try out a new short cut by going the other way around. He sailed up to Manhattan, and the silly fellow thought he'd arrived in India. When they inexplicably refused his credit card he had to trade beads for those strange looking chapatis and papadums. Without proper spices, well of course it would all be inedible when he got back! Easy to appreciate why she threw her glass of Coke over him; even the corgis turned their noses up at the stuff! Thus (without the royal endorsement) pizza took a good while to catch on. History is so interesting I don't know why they no longer do the real thing in schools these days.

I'm currently experimenting with Android browsers to see which is the easiest to use here with a view to a recommendation. It's immediately clear that the stock Android browser can easily be bettered on speed. Currently Dolphin seems the most popular download. It's true that it's both friendly and fast, the big downer is that it doesn't appear to work at all with Live! I will report the results of my testing on this thread, but any other input would be very helpful.

Hmmm... you believe all that Eggy? Next thing someone will pop up to claim that Sir Walter Raleigh didn't actually bring pizza back from America!

Do Greggs even want to be in the EU? Having met the senior members of the family when they were looking for their first Bedlington shop I'd guess that they'd say the same as most small to medium sided UK business. i.e. they can manage perfectly well without it, thank you! There's very likely similar enterprises in Germany and all points East. They will each cater for varying national tastes. We need to celebrate such differences, else what would be the point of going on holiday (OK, there's the weather! ), not homogenise them away with top-down regulation, and the likes of TTIP. The only people who benefit from this are international corporations who can exploit both producers in poorer countries, and then milk consumers in richer countries. And... dare I say it, but your fave phone megacorporation is one of the very worst offenders here! Links to non-Guardian/non-BBC articles on request!

Francois Hollande is seldom right about anything, but yesterday's veiled threat was dead on the money, even if his interpretation was skewed. As Duplicitous Dave pulls all the strings of power anyone who tells the truth does so at the risk of their career. Today's casualty is the Director General of the British Chambers of Commerce. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/12184219/Business-chief-suspended-after-coming-out-in-favour-of-Brexit.html In a just world the casualty should be Dave himself. Several of his recent pronouncements about the status of our still great Country vividly illustrate that he's totally unfit to lead it. Fortunately the great majority of the Tory party have recently arrived at the same conclusion. So, whatever the outcome of the referendum he's OUT, and certainly not at a time of his own choosing.

Ah, that's an easy one! Answer: They are not in UK Waters, they are in EU Waters fishing EU fish. And... why are you complaining as the EU has ensured that we no longer have any sort of recognisable fishing industry anyway? That's unlike little Norway where a real democracy has stubbornly maintained independence (and one of the highest living standards in the world). And yes, the politicians there tried their very own Project Fear - but it still leaves more than 70% of the population unimpressed.

This is true, but what is the basis of this in international law? We are told that the UK Border has been relocated there. At least we are told this for the purposes of Dave's Project Fear. Another interesting question is if it's a "service" then who is it serving? It can't be serving British citizens as there is no legal requirement for them to have a passport to enter the UK. A UK Passport is a missive addressed to foreign governments. Her Majesty doesn't go in for writing letters to herself! Entering the UK is the constitutional right of every British citizen.

Now that all Duplicitous Dave's other lies have been exposed there's a fall-back on the Project Fear staple of Kent being overrun with illegal immigrants. I've never heard a convincing argument as to why our other points of entry don't have immigrant camps surrounding them, and why turning illegals around wherever won't work, but, from one of Dave's minions here's the devastating logic that proves his case: Apparently, YES, we CAN turn immigrants around when they set foot on UK territory BUT - and we are expected to believe it's a BIG BIG BUT - once they reach the UK they can claim asylum, and it's is oh so difficult to disprove false claims here. So difficult that we simply have to let them in! Now here's my question(s): If for legal purposes we have UK Border signs up at Calais with desks manned by UK officials, surely for legal purposes that must be the err... UK Border? If it isn't the UK Border then someone is BSing someone and a challenge in the international courts from some bunch of do-gooder lawyers or other "no borders" group is going to be a breeze. Doubtless when this happens the Westminster elites will express outrage that we've been thwarted again, and cave to international law in the well established pattern. The lawyers will get even richer, but nothing will actually be done. What precisely is the difference between the same UK Border sign (manned by the same UK agency) at a UK airport or ferry terminal and the same sign erected near the entrance to the channel tunnel on ostensibly French territory? Does this mean that all the international law about embassies being the sovereign territory of the state they represent is a sham? If so why don't our police just tramp in to the London Venezuelan one and arrest Julian Assange instead of throwing our hard-earned tax money at the problem they have created? If I'm wrong about this then the logical conclusion is that UK officials have no right to be exercising powers of entry or exit to the UK on French soil and one can simply brush past them, as under international law they are acting illegally. The reality seems to be that the answer to these questions is whatever suits Dave's Project Fear at any given instant. It's rather apt that some are comparing him to a used-car salesman, but that must surely be a slur on the integrity of used-car salesmen everywhere!

Oh dear! That did not refer to her religion (I have no information she's a practising Jew, and I guess probably not), but simply to her origins. It's still allowed to refer to someone's origins in our terminally PC society you know! We have rather a lot of Jewish lawyers, but I'm sure that the vast majority of them have as much loyalty to their country of adoption as I do, and possibly even more. This one clearly doesn't, and is likely "of the internationalist Jewish school of thought". That's precisely what it has to do with it. Or.. in words even the labelling, unthinking, left can understand: Jewish Karl Marx bad; Jewish Groucho Marx good! Jewish-Brit Benjamin Disraeli a hero; Jewish-Internationalist Ed Miliband an utter plonker! By the way I forgot the real insult: she gained an Oxford PPE along with the rest of the professional liars!

Out this coming week: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Broken-Vows-Blair-Tragedy-Power-ebook/dp/B0193H0LAE It details how Teflon Tony hand picked immigration minister Barbara Roche to do his bidding and open the floodgates to near uncontrolled immigration, then forbade anyone in the Labour Party to even discuss this. Blair knew he was acting against the interests of the very people who put him in power, but was determined to go through with his social engineering. The text is backed up with interviews with some 200 MPs. Tony's Jewish lawyer chummie Roche was so popular that, as an MP, she succeeded in turning a Labour majority of over 20.000 in her safe London Labour seat into a LD one. So, at a personal level, her bid to flood the electoral register with ever-grateful Labour-voting immigrants wasn't exactly a roaring success. Now we know precisely why Miliband always avoided the subject.

Fixed! "Someone" forgot to do a reset after changing over some cabling.

Interesting that certain newspapers are blasting Boris Johnson for being scheming and ambitious. Show me a politico that isn't, and I will show you one that is retiring or quitting politics very soon. Do we need a PM who isn't ambitious, particularly if that doesn't include ambition for their country too? Duplicitous Dave 's ambition only goes as far himself and his tenure as boss of a rapidly federalising Europe. Like Teflon Tony his being UK PM is only a leg up in his internationalist ambitions - after that their country can go hang. Nothing made this clearer than his recent exhorting to Tory MPs to ignore their constituency associations. That must surely qualify him for a seat on the Council of Ministers - failed national politicos all! A bonus to voting Out is that Dave will be forced to go right away, and his term as EU Council President late next year will be ended as decisively as Blair's EU supremo job was snatched away by Dave's very own scheming. There's a tiny bit of natural justice in that. Boris may already have decided Out when Nigel Farage told him last week that siding with Dave's quisling government would put him on the wrong side of history and kill his prospects of ever leading the Tory party stone dead. If so that shows he's ahead of the game, which is what we need a PM to be. If not it illustrates he listens to all the evidence and puts facts, broader opinion, and realistically achievable outcomes before party loyalty - also what this country needs in a leader. Make no mistake, I'm certainly not a Boris supporter (I don't even vote Tory), but when it comes down to basics Boris is infinitely preferable as a leader of this country to Dave and his scheming minions.

I'm saving the best jokes for when The Guardian finally runs out of (other people's) money Maggie!. Still, I don't suppose that even then Guardianistas will see the supreme irony in that. If it goes up for sale in a £1 fire-sale, like the Indy did, I'm going to consider a purchase. There'd only be one edition under my proprietorship though, and the headline will be fairly near to a steal from Spike Milligan's tombstone.

Well... they are all still sticking to that script. Interesting that George Galloway was on the same platform as Nigel Farage last night. Some of the Tories and Labour MPs "outers" weren't too happy about this, but I think this is now boiling down to people who trust democracy against those who try to manipulate it quite regardless of any party affiliation. And, I'm going to disagree with you about the spin being on both sides Maggie. All the spin is coming from Dodgy Dave and his bedfellows in the establishment and big business. When Blair and Mandleson are supporting Dave with his international businesses and banker cronies, it becomes pretty clear that the best interest of ordinary Brits is served by a decisive out vote.

Yes, but enough about The (moral) Guardian Maggie, what about The Express?

Express headline today: Weather girl Laura Tobin rips priceless superhero poster worth £150,000 http://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/645585/Weather-girl-Laura-Tobin-rips-priceless-comic-book-150-000-Good-Morning-Britain-ITV But maybe priceless is now the new Camspeak: where words such as fundamental, reform, legally-binding, treaty and change don't mean remotely the same as they did last week?